Glasshouse Fund
Decision journal

AI fund decision · September 29, 2026

Maintain a neutral, low-turnover posture. Hold core leaders without increasing concentration, avoid averaging into weakening holdings or watchlist laggards, and retain the elevated cash reserve until market breadth and relative-strength signals improve.

Outlook: NEUTRALPortfolio $1,040,200Cash 28.8%Grounding: ok

Trades

No trades this day. The fund held.

Market calls

A directional call (beat or lag the S&P 500 over the horizon) on every researched name, whether or not the fund traded it. 34 calls (15 outperform, 19 underperform); 0 became trades. These are the fund's calibration record.

beat SPYlag SPYAAPL: outperform at 62%AMD: underperform at 58%AMZN: underperform at 61%APLD: underperform at 72%ASML: outperform at 56%AVGO: underperform at 59%BE: outperform at 55%CAT: outperform at 54%CORZ: underperform at 64%CRWV: underperform at 57%GLW: underperform at 53%GOOGL: underperform at 60%HD: underperform at 71%INTC: underperform at 57%IREN: underperform at 69%JNJ: outperform at 55%JPM: underperform at 59%MA: underperform at 56%META: outperform at 60%MSFT: outperform at 65%MU: underperform at 54%NVDA: outperform at 61%ORCL: underperform at 73%PG: outperform at 54%QQQ: outperform at 52%SNDK: underperform at 55%SPY: outperform at 50%TSLA: underperform at 61%TSM: outperform at 62%UNH: underperform at 64%V: underperform at 55%WMT: outperform at 53%XOM: outperform at 54%^VIX: outperform at 57%50%60%70%80%90%100%
Each tick is one call, placed by stated confidence. Hover for the name.
All 34 calls, with reasoning
SymbolCallConf.Why
ORCLUnderperform SPY73%Sharp negative returns over five and 30 days indicate persistent relative weakness.
APLDUnderperform SPY72%The stock is down 14.1% over five days and 15.0% over 30 days despite a positive backlog headline.
HDUnderperform SPY71%A 13.6% 30-day decline and 5.1% five-day decline signal persistent weakness.
IRENUnderperform SPY69%The stock has fallen sharply over five days and remains negative over 30 days.
MSFTOutperform SPY65%Positive five-day and 30-day momentum alongside an AI-cybersecurity product catalyst supports relative strength.
CORZUnderperform SPY64%Weak five-day and 30-day returns outweigh the partnership-related rebound narrative.
UNHUnderperform SPY64%The stock is below cost and down 4.1% over 30 days, despite a small five-day rebound.
AAPLOutperform SPY62%Its 9.2% 30-day gain versus a flat SPY supports relative outperformance, tempered by recent short-term weakness and concentration risk.
TSMOutperform SPY62%Positive returns over both horizons support continued AI-semiconductor relative strength, despite cyclical and geopolitical risk.
AMZNUnderperform SPY61%Negative five-day and 30-day momentum indicates weaker near-term relative performance.
NVDAOutperform SPY61%A 7.5% 30-day gain, stable five-day performance, and buyback authorization support relative resilience.
TSLAUnderperform SPY61%A 5.7% five-day decline and only modest 30-day gain leave weak near-term relative momentum.
GOOGLUnderperform SPY60%Negative returns over five and 30 days, plus EU AI-access-order pressure, leave relative momentum weak.
METAOutperform SPY60%Its 25.6% 30-day gain is the strongest portfolio momentum signal, though the recent pullback lowers conviction.
AVGOUnderperform SPY59%Negative returns over both five and 30 days indicate fading relative momentum.
JPMUnderperform SPY59%Negative five-day and 30-day momentum suggests pressure despite solid gains versus cost.
AMDUnderperform SPY58%A 26.9% 30-day surge followed by a 2.5% five-day decline suggests elevated reversal risk versus SPY.
CRWVUnderperform SPY57%Negative returns across both horizons show weaker momentum than SPY.
INTCUnderperform SPY57%The 32.6% 30-day advance is strong, but a 6.3% five-day fall and fresh AI-risk headlines increase reversal risk.
^VIXOutperform SPY57%VIX has risen over both periods amid higher yields and AI jitters, indicating continued volatility sensitivity.
ASMLOutperform SPY56%Positive returns across five and 30 days support modest relative strength in semiconductor equipment.
MAUnderperform SPY56%A positive five-day move is insufficient to offset the 5.2% 30-day decline.
BEOutperform SPY55%A strong 20.9% 30-day gain and favorable expansion-related news offset a recent five-day pullback.
JNJOutperform SPY55%Positive five-day performance and defensive characteristics support modest relative resilience despite a slightly negative 30-day return.
SNDKUnderperform SPY55%Strong 30-day AI-storage momentum is challenged by a sharp 9.2% five-day drop.
VUnderperform SPY55%Its positive five-day return does not yet reverse the 4.3% 30-day decline.
CATOutperform SPY54%Positive returns over both measured periods indicate modestly constructive industrial relative strength.
MUUnderperform SPY54%Strong 30-day performance is offset by a 3.8% five-day decline, leaving elevated semiconductor reversal risk.
PGOutperform SPY54%Positive momentum across both periods and defensive demand characteristics support modest outperformance.
XOMOutperform SPY54%Positive five-day and 30-day performance offers modest support while oil remains a market focus.
GLWUnderperform SPY53%Its positive 30-day return is offset by a 5.1% five-day decline and meaningful disclosed execution risks.
WMTOutperform SPY53%Positive 30-day performance and defensive characteristics support modest relative resilience despite a weak five-day move.
QQQOutperform SPY52%Positive 30-day technology leadership may persist, but the recent decline and rising yields limit conviction.
SPYOutperform SPY50%SPY is the benchmark reference and is assigned neutral baseline confidence.

The debate

Bull, bear and risk cases: bull 0.82 · bear 0.86 · risk 0.97
bull case · conviction 0.82

Buy or hold the portfolio's strongest technology and semiconductor leaders: despite a flat-to-weaker broader market and rising volatility, several holdings are delivering substantial 30-day outperformance, supported by identifiable AI, cybersecurity, capital-return, and platform catalysts. The evidence favors maintaining exposure to relative-strength leaders rather than reducing them solely because of short-term pullbacks.

  • Relative strength is compelling: the S&P 500 declined 0.03% over 30 days, while AAPL rose 9.2%, NVDA 7.5%, TSM 8.8%, MSFT 3.6%, and META 25.6%.
  • META is the clearest momentum leader in the portfolio, up 25.6% over 30 days and 29.2% above the stated average cost. Its recent AI-related news also identifies Meta's Muse as a competitive factor in local AI.
  • AAPL has strong intermediate momentum, gaining 9.2% over 30 days and trading above the stated average cost. Although it fell modestly over five days and faces AI-related competitive concerns, the 30-day trend remains decisively stronger than the benchmark.
  • NVDA's 7.5% 30-day gain and essentially flat five-day performance indicate continued relative resilience. The reported addition of $150 billion to its stock-buyback authorization is a significant capital-return catalyst and supports the holding case.
  • MSFT combines positive momentum across both measured periods: up 2.3% over five days and 3.6% over 30 days. Its reported AI cybersecurity model launch provides a concrete product catalyst alongside positive analyst commentary.
  • TSM is up 8.8% over 30 days and 0.2% over five days, showing sustained strength rather than a purely short-lived spike. The position is also above its stated average cost.
  • The portfolio already owns several positions with meaningful gains versus average cost, including MSFT, NVDA, AAPL, META, TSM, MA, V, JNJ, and GLW. With approximately $299,000 in cash, the evidence supports selectively adding to the strongest relative-strength names rather than making broad purchases.
  • The case is not uniformly bullish: AMZN, GOOGL, JPM, UNH, and XOM have negative 30-day momentum, while volatility is rising and the news flow cites higher yields and AI jitters. That argues for concentration in proven momentum leaders, not indiscriminate buying.
bear case · conviction 0.86

The portfolio is exposed to a broad deterioration in momentum despite a flat benchmark, with several holdings already below cost and multiple previously strong positions showing sharp 30-day declines. The clearest risk is that recent winners are becoming reversal candidates while laggards continue to weaken; candidates with even worse momentum would add downside rather than diversify it.

  • UNH is the weakest current holding on both measures provided: it is 7.9% below average cost and down 4.1% over 30 days.
  • GOOGL is simultaneously underwater by 3.2% and down 1.1% over 30 days, indicating ongoing weakness rather than a clear recovery.
  • AMZN is down 5.7% over 30 days while only modestly above average cost, leaving limited evidence of durable upside momentum.
  • JPM, MA, and V have each suffered material 30-day declines of 5.6%, 5.2%, and 4.3%, respectively. Their gains versus average cost could therefore be vulnerable to profit-taking or further momentum reversal.
  • WMT and XOM are already below average cost by 1.7% and 4.4%, respectively; XOM also has a negative 30-day signal, reinforcing the risk of continued deterioration.
  • JNJ has a negative 30-day return despite being above cost, while the absence of stronger momentum evidence makes its recent gain less secure.
  • Several candidates have substantially worse momentum than the weakening holdings: HD is down 13.6%, APLD 15.0%, ORCL 8.4%, and CORZ 8.4% over 30 days. Buying these would amount to adding demonstrated weakness.
  • The benchmark was essentially flat over 30 days, so the breadth of negative signals is not explained by a broad market selloff alone; it points to relative weakness across multiple portfolio names.
  • GLW's cautionary filings explicitly identify risks including customer demand, margin expansion, technology change, product or component issues, loss of significant customers, regulatory developments, litigation, and customer financing or payment problems. Its current gain does not remove those operational risks.
risk case · conviction 0.97

The primary capital risk is concentrated exposure to a small number of positions and sectors. AAPL, JNJ, and AMZN represent 67.3% of invested assets, while Information Technology alone is 47.6% of invested assets. The 28.8% cash allocation provides a meaningful buffer against mark-to-market losses, but it also means portfolio risk is driven by a relatively concentrated 71.2% invested sleeve rather than broad diversification.

  • AAPL is the largest position at 30.0% of invested assets, creating the biggest single-name exposure.
  • JNJ and AMZN add 19.6% and 17.7%, respectively; the top three positions comprise 67.3% of invested assets.
  • Information Technology is 47.6% of invested assets, with additional exposure through MSFT at 9.4%, GOOGL at 7.1%, NVDA at 4.6%, GLW at 1.8%, and TSM at 1.7%.
  • Health Care is the second-largest sector at 19.7%, driven primarily by JNJ's 19.6% position; this creates substantial single-name concentration within that sector.
  • Consumer Discretionary is 17.7%, effectively concentrated in AMZN, so the sector allocation does not represent broad diversification.
  • Cash is 28.8% of the portfolio, reducing total portfolio exposure but leaving the invested capital concentrated: approximately 21.4% of total portfolio value is AAPL, 14.0% is JNJ, and 12.6% is AMZN.

Cash thesis

Cash is 28.8% of portfolio value. This elevated reserve is intentional: it offsets meaningful single-name and technology-sector concentration, provides protection while yields rise and volatility increases, and preserves optionality without forcing purchases into weak watchlist names or extended winners. The cash position is high, but justified by mixed breadth, uneven holding momentum, and the portfolio's existing exposure to AI and mega-cap technology.

Full commentary

Bear case response

Accept: UNH is below cost and down 4.1% over 30 days, so it remains a weak, small position that does not merit additional capital. Accept: GOOGL is below cost and modestly negative over 30 days; maintain rather than average down until relative strength improves. Accept: AMZN is down 5.7% over 30 days and only modestly above cost, warranting monitoring and no new purchase, though its large existing position is retained absent a decisive thesis break. Accept: JPM, MA and V have negative 30-day momentum despite gains versus cost; do not add to financials or payment networks now. Accept: WMT and XOM are below cost, with XOM also negative over 30 days; retain only as small diversifiers and avoid averaging down. Partly accept: JNJ's negative 30-day return weakens its momentum case, but its positive five-day move, gain versus cost, and defensive role support holding rather than trimming solely on one month of softness. Accept: HD, APLD, ORCL and CORZ have materially weak momentum and should not be purchased simply because cash is available. Accept: the flat benchmark means the breadth of weak holdings is a relative-performance concern, not merely a market-wide decline. Accept: GLW's disclosed operating, customer, regulatory and execution risks remain relevant despite its gain; its position should remain modest. Reject the implication that all recent winners should be sold: MSFT, NVDA, TSM and AAPL retain stronger 30-day relative performance, but they should be held without additional concentration.

Market summary

The broad market is roughly flat over 30 days, while SPY and QQQ have softened over the last five days and VIX has risen 13.1% over five days. Rising Treasury yields and AI-related jitters argue against aggressive deployment, although selected large-cap technology leaders retain meaningful relative strength.

Portfolio assessment

The portfolio is profitable and retains strong core exposure to AAPL, JNJ, AMZN, MSFT, NVDA and other leaders, but the invested sleeve remains highly concentrated. AAPL is approximately 21.4% of total portfolio value, JNJ about 14.0%, and AMZN about 12.6%. The appropriate action is to preserve existing core holdings, avoid adding to concentrated winners after strong advances, and wait for either broader confirmation or more attractive entry points.

Risk assessment

The primary risk is concentration rather than insufficient market exposure. AAPL, JNJ and AMZN dominate the portfolio, while technology-linked positions remain correlated to AI spending, regulation, higher yields and momentum reversals. AMZN, GOOGL, UNH, XOM, JPM, MA and V have weaker 30-day signals, while AAPL, META and semiconductor holdings could be vulnerable to profit-taking after gains. Cash cushions total-portfolio drawdown but cannot eliminate losses in the concentrated invested sleeve.

← September 25, 2026 September 30, 2026 →