Glasshouse Fund
Decision journal

AI fund decision · October 21, 2026

No trades. Hold proven leaders, avoid additions to concentrated or weakening positions, and retain 28.1% cash until breadth improves or a better risk-adjusted entry emerges. Sources influencing this decision include risk_lesson:run_20260729T184341Z_54100baf:report_risk, risk_lesson:run_20260803T191113Z_b5f11a59:report_risk, trade:run_20260812T183945Z_0d1bf062:AAPL:SELL, trade:run_20261001T194714Z_9239ded3:AAPL:SELL, and trade:run_20260731T185916Z_e4b0cfaf:NVDA:SELL.

Outlook: NEUTRALPortfolio $1,056,217Cash 28.1%Grounding: ok

Trades

No trades this day. The fund held.

Market calls

A directional call (beat or lag the S&P 500 over the horizon) on every researched name, whether or not the fund traded it. 34 calls (16 outperform, 18 underperform); 0 became trades. These are the fund's calibration record.

beat SPYlag SPYAAPL: underperform at 59%AMD: underperform at 64%AMZN: outperform at 69%APLD: underperform at 73%ASML: outperform at 55%AVGO: underperform at 56%BE: underperform at 72%CAT: underperform at 66%CORZ: underperform at 68%CRWV: underperform at 75%GLW: underperform at 65%GOOGL: underperform at 61%HD: outperform at 63%INTC: underperform at 62%IREN: underperform at 81%JNJ: underperform at 56%JPM: underperform at 58%MA: outperform at 68%META: outperform at 57%MSFT: outperform at 67%MU: underperform at 59%NVDA: outperform at 54%ORCL: underperform at 66%PG: outperform at 68%QQQ: outperform at 60%SNDK: underperform at 67%SPY: outperform at 50%TSLA: outperform at 58%TSM: outperform at 56%UNH: outperform at 72%V: outperform at 69%WMT: outperform at 68%XOM: outperform at 63%^VIX: underperform at 55%50%60%70%80%90%100%
Each tick is one call, placed by stated confidence. Hover for the name.
All 34 calls, with reasoning
SymbolCallConf.Why
IRENUnderperform SPY81%The 37.54% 30-day decline, 12.89% five-day decline and funding concerns indicate high downside risk.
CRWVUnderperform SPY75%The 25.46% 30-day decline and 5.55% five-day loss indicate severe unresolved downside momentum.
APLDUnderperform SPY73%The 20.75% 30-day decline and negative five-day trend indicate an unconfirmed speculative reversal.
BEUnderperform SPY72%The 17.54% 30-day loss and negative five-day momentum outweigh isolated positive news.
UNHOutperform SPY72%Strong 5.98% five-day and 11.73% 30-day gains support leading relative strength.
AMZNOutperform SPY69%Positive 3.37% five-day and 6.78% 30-day momentum provides one of the clearest relative-strength profiles.
VOutperform SPY69%Positive short-term momentum and a 9.61% 30-day gain support continued payments-sector leadership.
CORZUnderperform SPY68%A small five-day bounce does not offset an 18.31% 30-day decline.
MAOutperform SPY68%Positive five-day momentum and a 9.44% 30-day gain support continued relative strength.
PGOutperform SPY68%Positive short-term momentum and an 8.37% 30-day gain provide defensive relative strength.
WMTOutperform SPY68%Positive five-day momentum and a 9.63% 30-day gain show strong defensive-consumer relative performance.
MSFTOutperform SPY67%An 8.48% 30-day gain, stable five-day action and AI-related support outweigh event-related volatility risk.
SNDKUnderperform SPY67%Negative five-day action and a 10.17% 30-day decline show persistent weakness.
CATUnderperform SPY66%Negative returns over both five and 30 days indicate a weakening cyclical trend.
ORCLUnderperform SPY66%A modest five-day gain does not overcome an 8.06% 30-day decline.
GLWUnderperform SPY65%Negative five-day and 30-day momentum combines with documented execution and demand risks.
AMDUnderperform SPY64%A 6.32% five-day decline and a 10.2% loss versus cost outweigh its positive 30-day return.
HDOutperform SPY63%Strong positive returns over both five and 30 days indicate improving relative strength.
XOMOutperform SPY63%Positive five-day action and an 8.90% 30-day gain support relative resilience.
INTCUnderperform SPY62%Upgrade-related strength is not yet sufficient to reverse negative 5-day and 30-day momentum.
GOOGLUnderperform SPY61%The holding is below cost and has negative five-day and slightly negative 30-day momentum despite long-term strategic assets.
QQQOutperform SPY60%Positive 30-day performance versus SPY's negative monthly result supports a modest technology-led relative advantage.
AAPLUnderperform SPY59%Recent five-day weakness and downgrade/iPhone-demand concerns temper an otherwise profitable core position versus SPY.
MUUnderperform SPY59%Negative returns over both five and 30 days indicate weaker semiconductor relative momentum.
JPMUnderperform SPY58%Flat five-day performance and a 3.44% 30-day decline imply limited relative momentum.
TSLAOutperform SPY58%Positive five-day and 30-day momentum support a modest relative-strength outlook.
METAOutperform SPY57%Positive 30-day performance supports relative strength, though the 5.87% five-day pullback lowers conviction.
AVGOUnderperform SPY56%Negative five-day and 30-day returns show weaker near-term relative momentum.
JNJUnderperform SPY56%Positive five-day action is offset by a 2.96% 30-day decline and weak medical-device-sales headline risk.
TSMOutperform SPY56%Positive 30-day performance and only mild five-day weakness support a narrow edge over SPY.
ASMLOutperform SPY55%Slightly positive 30-day performance and limited five-day weakness support modest relative resilience.
^VIXUnderperform SPY55%The 30-day decline in volatility supports a modest risk-on bias, though the recent five-day VIX increase limits conviction.
NVDAOutperform SPY54%Slightly positive 30-day performance and a profitable position support a narrow relative-strength edge despite recent weakness.
SPYOutperform SPY50%As the benchmark, SPY is the neutral baseline; the call is mechanically balanced rather than an active security preference.

The debate

Bull, bear and risk cases: bull 0.78 · bear 0.87 · risk 0.98
bull case · conviction 0.78

Buy or hold the strongest relative-strength leaders rather than de-risking broadly. The S&P 500 declined 0.67% over 30 days, while several portfolio holdings delivered substantial positive momentum: UNH gained 11.73%, WMT 9.63%, V 9.61%, MA 9.44%, XOM 8.90%, MSFT 8.48%, PG 8.37%, and AMZN 6.78%. This breadth across healthcare, payments, retail, energy, consumer staples, software, and e-commerce argues that the portfolio has multiple independent sources of strength. The market backdrop is also improving at the margin, with recent reports describing gains in the Dow, S&P 500, and Nasdaq and a technology-led rally. The strongest catalyst is MSFT, where positive coverage highlights AI exposure and a calendar event on October 28; AMZN is showing both strong five-day and 30-day momentum; and UNH, V, MA, WMT, and XOM combine positive short-term momentum with clear benchmark outperformance. The case is for maintaining exposure and selectively adding to relative-strength leaders, while recognizing that AAPL, GOOGL, JPM, AMD, and NVDA have weaker or mixed recent momentum and that several holdings face headline-specific risks.

  • Relative strength is broad: the S&P 500 fell 0.67% over 30 days, versus gains of 11.73% for UNH, 9.63% for WMT, 9.61% for V, 9.44% for MA, 8.90% for XOM, 8.48% for MSFT, 8.37% for PG, and 6.78% for AMZN.
  • Near-term momentum confirms the trend in several leaders: UNH rose 5.98% over five days, V 3.87%, AMZN 3.37%, MA 2.85%, WMT 1.45%, and XOM 0.48%.
  • MSFT is a particularly attractive hold: its 30-day gain of 8.48% substantially exceeds the benchmark, positive coverage identifies it as an AI pick, and an October 28 calendar event provides a near-term catalyst.
  • AMZN has one of the cleanest momentum profiles in the portfolio, rising 3.37% over five days and 6.78% over 30 days, both while the benchmark was weak over the month.
  • Payments exposure is working: V and MA gained 9.61% and 9.44% over 30 days, with both also positive over five days, supporting continued exposure to these leaders.
  • Defensive and diversified participation strengthens the buy-and-hold case: UNH, PG, WMT, and XOM all posted strong 30-day gains, reducing reliance on a single technology theme.
  • The broader market backdrop has improved recently, with market reports citing gains in the Dow, S&P 500, and Nasdaq and a technology-led rally.
  • The bullish case is selective rather than indiscriminate: AAPL has downgrade and iPhone-demand concerns, GOOGL is down 0.76% over 30 days, JPM is down 3.44%, AMD is down 6.32% over five days, and NVDA has not responded strongly to China-purchase rumors.
  • GOOGL still has a longer-term constructive angle in the provided fund memory: Waymo is expanding domestically, entering international markets, and scaling operations, although recent price momentum does not yet confirm that thesis.
  • Several holdings are already profitable versus their listed average costs, including AAPL, MSFT, NVDA, UNH, AMZN, JPM, V, MA, META, PG, WMT, XOM, TSM, and JNJ; this supports holding winners while using relative strength to guide incremental purchases.
bear case · conviction 0.87

The bearish case is that downside is already visible in several holdings and is broader among the candidate set than the benchmark's modest 30-day decline suggests. GOOGL and AMD are below cost, while GOOGL, JNJ, and JPM are also showing negative 30-day momentum. Candidate momentum is materially worse in several names, indicating elevated risk of catching falling securities rather than buying confirmed strength.

  • GOOGL is down 5.0% versus average cost and has negative 30-day momentum of 0.8%, making it the clearest holding-level deterioration signal.
  • AMD is down 10.2% versus average cost, the largest unrealized loss identified in the holdings, weakening the case for continued exposure.
  • JNJ and JPM have both faded over 30 days, down 3.0% and 3.4%, respectively, despite being current holdings.
  • The candidate list contains substantially worse momentum: IREN is down 37.5%, CRWV 25.5%, APLD 20.7%, CORZ 18.3%, and BE 17.5% over 30 days.
  • Additional candidate weakness is broad rather than isolated: CAT, GLW, INTC, ORCL, and SNDK are each down roughly 7% to 10% over 30 days.
  • GLW's disclosed risk factors include customer losses or financing problems, difficulty matching capital spending to demand, margin-execution risk, technology change, litigation, regulatory action, and product-performance issues; its 30-day momentum is already down 8.3%.
  • The S&P 500 is down only 0.7% over 30 days, so the much larger declines in several holdings and candidates represent meaningful relative weakness rather than merely a market-wide retreat.
  • The evidence does not show positive momentum confirmation for the names with the clearest downside signals; adding to these securities would risk reinforcing exposure while price trends are deteriorating.
risk case · conviction 0.98

The largest capital risk is concentration within the 71.9% invested portion of the portfolio. AAPL, AMZN, and JNJ account for 64.0% of invested assets, while Information Technology, Health Care, and Consumer Discretionary together represent 83.1% of invested assets. The 28.1% cash allocation reduces overall market exposure, but it does not prevent a material drawdown in the concentrated invested sleeve.

  • AAPL is the largest position at 27.2% of invested assets, creating the clearest single-name concentration risk.
  • AMZN and JNJ each represent approximately 18% of invested assets; together with AAPL, the top three positions comprise 64.0% of the invested portfolio.
  • Information Technology is 44.3% of invested assets, led by AAPL, MSFT, GOOGL, NVDA, TSM, AMD, and META.
  • Health Care is 20.4% and Consumer Discretionary is 18.4%, leaving limited diversification across major sector exposures.
  • Cash is 28.1% of the total portfolio, which provides a meaningful buffer and lowers total invested exposure, but the remaining capital is concentrated rather than broadly distributed.

Cash thesis

Cash is 28.1% of portfolio value and is intentionally retained. It offsets concentration in AAPL, AMZN and JNJ, limits total-portfolio exposure while market breadth is uneven, and preserves optionality for a broader pullback or confirmed relative-strength opportunities. Deploying cash today would either increase exposure to already concentrated winners or average into weaker names, neither of which is supported by the current evidence.

Full commentary

Bear case response

Accept the core concentration warning: AAPL, AMZN and JNJ dominate invested capital, so no new capital should be directed to these holdings today. Accept that GOOGL is a concern because it is down 5.0% versus cost and has negative five-day and slightly negative 30-day momentum; retain it under review rather than averaging down. Accept that AMD is the largest unrealized loss at 10.2% below cost and has weak five-day momentum, although its supplied 30-day return is positive, so the evidence supports holding rather than an immediate forced sale. Accept that JNJ and JPM have negative 30-day returns and should not receive additions, but their declines are not sufficient alone to require liquidation. Accept the warning against candidates such as IREN, CRWV, APLD, CORZ, BE, GLW, INTC, ORCL and SNDK because their sharply negative 30-day trends lack confirmation. Reject indiscriminate de-risking: AMZN, MSFT, UNH, V, MA, WMT, PG and XOM show substantial relative strength versus SPY, supporting retention of diversified winners. This conclusion follows higher-priority memory constraints favoring incremental concentration management, avoidance of averaging down into weak momentum, and avoidance of repeated turnover.

Market summary

The market is mixed but improving at the margin: SPY is up modestly over five days but remains down 0.67% over 30 days, while the VIX has risen over five days to 16.63. Leadership is selective rather than broad. AMZN, MSFT, UNH, V, MA, WMT, PG and XOM have materially outperformed the benchmark over 30 days, while several semiconductors, communications names and speculative AI/data-center candidates have weak recent trends.

Portfolio assessment

Maintain existing holdings with no transactions. The portfolio has strong absolute gains in several core positions, but AAPL, AMZN and JNJ remain disproportionately large and technology-linked exposure is still substantial. Recent trades already reduced AAPL and NVDA risk incrementally; repeating turnover without a fresh deterioration signal would conflict with the low-turnover discipline. Do not add to concentrated leaders after gains, and do not average down into GOOGL or AMD without stronger confirmation.

Risk assessment

The principal risk is concentration, not insufficient equity exposure. AAPL is approximately 19.5% of total portfolio value, while AAPL, AMZN and JNJ together account for roughly 46% of total assets and about 64% of invested assets. Technology and AI/cloud-sensitive holdings remain correlated through AAPL, MSFT, NVDA, AMZN, GOOGL, TSM, AMD and META. AAPL downgrade headlines, GOOGL's position loss, AMD's 5-day decline, and event risk around large technology holdings warrant restraint. The cash reserve moderates, but does not eliminate, drawdown risk in the invested sleeve.

← October 20, 2026 October 22, 2026 →