Glasshouse Fund
Decision journal

AI fund sells TSM · November 4, 2026

Sell TSM as the single targeted risk reduction, hold the remaining portfolio, preserve the elevated cash reserve, and do not add to concentrated leaders or weakening semiconductor and AI-related positions until market breadth improves.

Outlook: NEUTRALPortfolio $1,067,559Cash 28.4%Grounding: ok

Trades

SELL 28 TSM82% · filled at $398

Exit the small TSM position because it is below its average cost and down 7.9% over five days and 11.3% over 30 days. The weakness is corroborated by broad semiconductor underperformance, and there is no supplied positive catalyst sufficient to justify retaining or averaging into the position.

Risks the AI named

Market calls

A directional call (beat or lag the S&P 500 over the horizon) on every researched name, whether or not the fund traded it. 34 calls (14 outperform, 20 underperform); 0 became trades. These are the fund's calibration record.

beat SPYlag SPYAAPL: underperform at 57%AMD: underperform at 73%AMZN: outperform at 58%APLD: underperform at 76%ASML: underperform at 68%AVGO: underperform at 62%BE: underperform at 69%CAT: underperform at 66%CORZ: underperform at 63%CRWV: underperform at 79%GLW: underperform at 56%GOOGL: underperform at 70%HD: outperform at 64%INTC: underperform at 84%IREN: underperform at 80%JNJ: outperform at 58%JPM: outperform at 59%MA: outperform at 70%META: underperform at 63%MSFT: outperform at 66%MU: underperform at 72%NVDA: underperform at 61%ORCL: underperform at 64%PG: outperform at 64%QQQ: underperform at 69%SNDK: underperform at 82%SPY: outperform at 50%TSLA: outperform at 56%TSM: underperform at 74%UNH: outperform at 61%V: outperform at 68%WMT: outperform at 71%XOM: outperform at 57%^VIX: outperform at 60%50%60%70%80%90%100%
Each tick is one call, placed by stated confidence. Hover for the name.
All 34 calls, with reasoning
SymbolCallConf.Why
INTCUnderperform SPY84%The extreme 36.6% five-day and 49.6% 30-day declines indicate severe negative momentum despite foundry-related headlines.
SNDKUnderperform SPY82%Very large negative five-day and 30-day returns indicate a broken momentum profile despite buyback-related commentary.
IRENUnderperform SPY80%Large 5-day and 30-day losses, combined with data-center power-policy risk, make the risk/reward unfavorable.
CRWVUnderperform SPY79%A 38.3% 30-day decline and data-center-policy uncertainty indicate a high-risk broken trend.
APLDUnderperform SPY76%Steep 5-day and 30-day losses and financing concerns leave the AI-data-center infrastructure trade technically impaired.
TSMUnderperform SPY74%TSM is below cost with negative five-day and 30-day momentum amid broad semiconductor weakness.
AMDUnderperform SPY73%Despite strong reported data-center revenue, the stock's sharply negative 5-day and 30-day momentum signals a damaged semiconductor trend.
MUUnderperform SPY72%The 13.0% five-day and 19.7% 30-day declines confirm broad memory and semiconductor trend weakness.
WMTOutperform SPY71%WMT's positive five-day and 20.2% 30-day return indicate the strongest defensive-consumer momentum in the supplied universe.
GOOGLUnderperform SPY70%GOOGL's 13.8% five-day and 18.6% 30-day declines reflect pronounced momentum deterioration, consistent with prior no-add guidance.
MAOutperform SPY70%Strong positive five-day and 30-day momentum supports continued relative strength, though the position should be held rather than chased.
BEUnderperform SPY69%The large negative 30-day return indicates weak trend support and elevated downside risk.
QQQUnderperform SPY69%The 7.4% 30-day decline versus a much smaller SPY decline shows sustained growth-sector relative weakness.
ASMLUnderperform SPY68%Negative semiconductor-sector momentum, including a 14.2% 30-day decline, remains a headwind versus SPY.
VOutperform SPY68%Strong positive five-day and 30-day returns demonstrate durable payments-sector relative strength.
CATUnderperform SPY66%CAT's sharp five-day and 30-day declines show sustained relative weakness despite its prior removal from the portfolio.
MSFTOutperform SPY66%Positive 30-day momentum and reported Azure-demand strength provide better support than most technology peers.
HDOutperform SPY64%HD's positive five-day and strong 30-day returns show clear relative strength, although it should not be chased after the advance.
ORCLUnderperform SPY64%ORCL's negative 5-day and 30-day momentum leaves it exposed to continued AI-infrastructure and enterprise-tech de-risking.
PGOutperform SPY64%Positive five-day and 30-day momentum supports a defensive relative-strength outlook versus SPY.
CORZUnderperform SPY63%Negative short- and medium-term momentum in a volatile infrastructure-related name is unfavorable versus SPY.
METAUnderperform SPY63%A modest five-day gain does not offset the 14.4% 30-day decline and broader mega-cap growth weakness.
AVGOUnderperform SPY62%AVGO has negative 5-day and 30-day momentum and remains exposed to the weak AI and semiconductor factor.
NVDAUnderperform SPY61%Negative five-day and 30-day momentum, together with sector-wide chip weakness, outweighs rebound commentary in the near term.
UNHOutperform SPY61%UNH's positive 30-day performance and defensive healthcare characteristics support relative resilience despite breakup-pressure headlines.
^VIXOutperform SPY60%The VIX has risen strongly over five and 30 days, consistent with continuing elevated volatility risk relative to SPY.
JPMOutperform SPY59%Positive 30-day performance and an improved net-interest-income outlook support a modestly favorable relative view.
AMZNOutperform SPY58%AMZN has held roughly flat over 30 days and has supportive cloud-related coverage, though conviction is constrained by its large existing exposure.
JNJOutperform SPY58%JNJ's nearly flat recent returns are relatively resilient in a weak market, supporting defensive relative performance despite medical-device sales concerns.
AAPLUnderperform SPY57%AAPL's 30-day return is slightly negative and it faces a memory-cost headwind, while its large portfolio weight limits the case for adding.
XOMOutperform SPY57%Positive 30-day momentum supports relative resilience, though the recent five-day decline and price near cost reduce conviction.
GLWUnderperform SPY56%The 17.9% 30-day decline outweighs only modest recent stabilization and leaves relative momentum weak.
TSLAOutperform SPY56%Positive 30-day performance and limited recent downside suggest better relative momentum than the broad index, though volatility remains high.
SPYOutperform SPY50%SPY is the comparison baseline; a neutral 0.50 relative call reflects no asserted directional edge against itself.

The debate

Bull, bear and risk cases: bull 0.76 · bear 0.93 · risk 0.98
bull case · conviction 0.76

Hold the portfolio and selectively add to its strongest relative-strength leaders rather than retreating to cash. Despite a challenging month for the S&P 500, several holdings are showing powerful positive momentum and meaningful outperformance, while Microsoft has a fundamental catalyst from surging Azure demand and Apple has delivered a fiscal Q4 earnings beat. The portfolio also retains approximately $292,077 in cash, providing flexibility to buy confirmed strength without forcing broad exposure.

  • The S&P 500 declined 2.6% over 30 days, but key holdings substantially outperformed: WMT gained 20.2%, MA 17.5%, HD 17.3%, V 17.0%, PG 12.3%, UNH 10.2%, and XOM 9.0%. This is strong evidence of relative strength and defensive resilience.
  • The strongest leaders are still advancing over five days: MA rose 6.0%, WMT 5.1%, HD 5.1%, V 4.9%, PG 2.4%, and META 1.4%, even as volatility increased with the VIX up 27.5% over 30 days.
  • Microsoft combines positive momentum with a clear catalyst: MSFT rose 1.6% over 30 days, and reported coverage attributes its record quarter to an Azure demand surge. That supports holding the position through market volatility.
  • Apple's recent 30-day performance is approximately flat, but its fiscal Q4 earnings beat was driven by strong iPhone and Services sales. That earnings result provides a fundamental support for holding despite the near-term memory-cost headwind.
  • The portfolio is not dependent on one narrow theme: payments leaders V and MA, consumer and defensive leaders WMT and PG, housing exposure through HD, healthcare through UNH and JNJ, and financial exposure through JPM all show positive 30-day performance.
  • Several holdings are already substantially above cost, including MSFT, AAPL, JNJ, UNH, AMZN, JPM, V, MA, META, PG, WMT, and HD based on the listed current prices and average costs. The evidence supports protecting and compounding existing winners rather than indiscriminately selling them.
  • The market backdrop has a potential near-term catalyst: reports say stocks rallied after Democrats took control of Congress. However, Reuters also reported that data-center stocks slid, so the better bullish expression is selective exposure to proven relative-strength names rather than aggressive buying across all technology holdings.
  • The evidence is mixed and argues for selectivity: NVDA, TSM, ORCL, GOOGL, and AVGO have negative 30-day momentum, while the VIX is rising. These names should be held only with appropriate risk tolerance, and new capital should favor the strongest relative-strength holdings.
  • The approximately $292,077 cash balance is an advantage, not a reason to exit: it permits staged purchases in leaders such as MA, V, WMT, HD, PG, and MSFT while preserving liquidity if volatility persists.
bear case · conviction 0.93

The portfolio is exposed to a broad deterioration in technology and growth momentum, while several holdings are already underperforming or losing trend support. The weakness is not isolated: QQQ is down 7.4% over 30 days, SPY is down 1.1%, and multiple portfolio technology holdings have materially negative 30-day returns. This creates downside risk even where positions remain above cost, because recent momentum is weakening across the same growth and semiconductor exposures.

  • A substantial portion of the portfolio is concentrated in technology, communications, and semiconductor names showing negative 30-day momentum: NVDA -9.5%, TSM -11.3%, META -14.4%, GOOGL -18.6%, ORCL -7.8%, AVGO -5.4%, and AAPL -0.3%.
  • NVDA is essentially at cost ($203.69 versus a $203.30 average cost) while its 30-day momentum is negative 9.5%, leaving little demonstrated margin of safety in the position.
  • TSM is both below average cost ($398.55 versus $414.49) and down 11.3% over 30 days, making it the clearest currently realized technology loss alongside XOM.
  • GOOGL and META have sizable recent declines despite still being above average cost, indicating that gains could continue to erode if the momentum deterioration persists.
  • AAPL's 30-day return is slightly negative, which undermines the case that the largest technology holdings are uniformly providing positive trend support.
  • The semiconductor weakness extends beyond current holdings: AMD is down 20.9%, ASML 14.2%, MU 19.7%, SNDK 35.3%, and INTC 49.6% over 30 days. This is a significant warning against adding to semiconductor candidates or assuming the sector weakness is limited to one company.
  • Several speculative infrastructure and energy-transition candidates show even sharper deterioration: CRWV -38.3%, IREN -40.2%, APLD -26.9%, and BE -22.7%. These should be treated as high-downside candidates rather than momentum opportunities.
  • The benchmark context is unfavorable: the S&P 500 is down 2.6% over 30 days, while QQQ is down 7.4%. Growth and technology exposure is therefore weakening faster than the broad market.
  • XOM is already slightly below cost and has no positive price cushion in the snapshot. Combined with the portfolio's technology weakness, this reduces the number of holdings providing clear downside protection.
  • The evidence supports caution on adding to GOOGL, META, NVDA, TSM, AVGO, and ORCL until their negative momentum improves; the more severe candidate declines argue against initiating AMD, ASML, MU, INTC, SNDK, CRWV, IREN, APLD, or BE based on recent price action.
risk case · conviction 0.98

Capital risk is dominated by concentrated exposure rather than overall gross investment, with 61.5% of invested assets in AAPL, JNJ, and AMZN and 83.5% across Information Technology, Health Care, and Consumer Discretionary. The 27.4% cash position provides a meaningful buffer and reduces portfolio-wide market exposure, but the invested capital remains highly dependent on a small number of positions and sectors.

  • AAPL is the largest position at 27.3% of invested assets, creating the greatest single-name concentration risk.
  • JNJ and AMZN add 19.2% and 15.0%, respectively; together with AAPL, the three largest positions represent 61.5% of invested assets.
  • Information Technology is 45.6% of invested assets, creating substantial sector concentration; AAPL and MSFT are the largest listed technology exposures.
  • Health Care is 21.2% and Consumer Discretionary is 16.7%; combined with Information Technology, these three sectors comprise 83.5% of invested assets.
  • The 27.4% cash level limits total invested exposure and offers liquidity, but 72.6% of portfolio value remains invested and is concentrated within the exposures above.
  • The evidence supports concentration and diversification risk, but does not establish portfolio performance relative to the S&P 500 from the benchmark return alone.

Cash thesis

Cash is 27.4% of portfolio value and is intentional rather than idle. It cushions the concentrated equity sleeve during a period of rising volatility, weak QQQ performance, and broad semiconductor deterioration. It also preserves optionality to deploy only after breadth and price confirmation improve; current evidence does not justify immediately allocating the reserve to either the largest holdings or the weak AI/semiconductor cohort.

Full commentary

Bear case response

Accept: technology and semiconductor momentum has deteriorated materially, as NVDA, TSM, GOOGL, META, ORCL, and AVGO have negative 30-day returns, while the wider chip complex is weaker still. This supports no new purchases in those exposures. Accept: TSM is below cost and down 11.3% over 30 days, making it the clearest existing momentum failure; this is addressed through a full exit. Accept: NVDA is close to cost and therefore lacks a large price cushion; however, its position size is modest and no forced sale is warranted today without a confirmed thesis break beyond price momentum. Accept: GOOGL and META have suffered meaningful recent drawdowns despite remaining above cost; they should be held without additions and monitored for further relative weakness. Accept: AAPL's approximately flat 30-day performance does not justify adding to the portfolio's largest position despite its earnings support. Accept: the broad decline in AMD, ASML, MU, SNDK, INTC, and speculative infrastructure names is a sector warning and rules out new semiconductor or data-center-infrastructure purchases. Reject the implication that all equity exposure should be reduced: WMT, PG, HD, V, MA, UNH, and MSFT show comparatively better momentum or fundamental support, and the existing 27.4% cash allocation already provides meaningful defense. The response is selective risk reduction and patience, not wholesale liquidation.

Market summary

The market is experiencing a mixed, rotation-driven tape: reported post-election strength supports broad equities, but technology and data-center-linked shares remain under pressure. SPY is modestly negative over 30 days while QQQ is down more sharply, and the VIX has risen materially. Relative strength is concentrated in defensives, payments, home improvement, and selected large-cap software rather than in semiconductors or AI infrastructure.

Portfolio assessment

The portfolio has substantial liquidity and several strong profitable holdings, but its invested sleeve remains concentrated. AAPL, JNJ, AMZN, and MSFT are the dominant exposures, while several technology and semiconductor positions have negative 30-day momentum. The appropriate posture is to retain proven leaders, avoid adding to concentrated mega-cap positions or weak chip/AI names, and make only a targeted risk reduction where the thesis and price trend have deteriorated.

Risk assessment

The primary risk is concentration, not insufficient exposure. AAPL is approximately 27.3% of invested assets, and AAPL, JNJ, and AMZN collectively account for about 61.5% of invested assets. Technology-linked exposure also has common sensitivity to valuation compression, AI capital-spending expectations, regulation, and declining semiconductor momentum. The cash reserve reduces total-portfolio volatility but cannot prevent drawdowns in the large existing positions. The targeted TSM exit follows prior fund lessons favoring early, incremental reductions in sustained weak momentum rather than averaging down.

← November 3, 2026